EOS 7D Reviews
The Canon EOS 7-D Digital SLR camera became available in September, 2009. The customer reviews are coming in and it looks like this camera is a winner! And the professional reviews make it sound like this camera will be another winner for Canon.
EOS 7D Customer Reviews
Should I upgrade? Um YES!,
By
J. Rhode
I upgraded from the Rebel XSi and boy what an upgrade it was! I'm mainly a hobbyist photographer even though my friends all say I should quit my day job (they just suck up because I will shoot their events for free!). I upgraded from the XSi because I kept finding myself arguing with the XSi over it's light metering, focus points and choice of shutter speeds in Aperture Priority mode. I can say without a doubt that the 7D out performs the XSi in every way (and it should since it's a semi pro camera while the XSi is a consumer camera!).
When I bought the 7D I slapped the 28-135 lens on it (already had it for the XSi) and started shooting, quickly noticing it's much improved light meter. It blew me away at how perfectly it would calibrate the white balance for every picture and what it was metering the light from. I was blown away just by that! After about a week of usage I decided to upgrade to an L lens for both the moisture/dust protection all around and also it give this camera a "proper" lens. It was worth every penny!
Matched with an L lens, this camera far exceeds what I was expecting out of it. I took it to a friends 1st birthday party and shoot the 1 year old using the L lens (17-40 UWA) on full manual at 100ISO, 50 shutter, aperture 4.0 with the 430EX flash and my god, the pictures are gorgeous! The camera's ability to track faces is spot on, the kid's eyes are sharp, crisp, colorful and full of life. They just make your heart melt! I'm sure it helps that this camera has special settings this lens in it's memory and it shows.
I have not played around with the video much, not my cup of tea. However my brother-in-law, who is a video editor, says the ability to capture video at such a short focal length requires thousands upon thousands of dollars in the video world and says that the 7D (and the 5Dmii for that matter) can do what a 10k camera can for a fraction of the price.
Another feature which was a welcome upgrade was the weather sealing. Not that I plan to go into the trenches with my camera but going out to a dusty, muddy farm and taking fall pictures is less worrisome now since I don't have to bother trying to keep my camera away from all the floating dust.
This is a phenomenal camera and I highly recommend it to anyone who is into photography as a hobby or a casual professional. I'm sure a "real" pro who lives their life on photography would welcome a full frame body more than the 1.6 crop but for me, I don't care, this camera does everything I want and more! It's a perfect addition to my ever growing camera bag and has become my one and only camera for which to shoot with. My poor XSi has been booted from my day bag and sits idle on my shelf collecting dust with it's non-dust protected body. I wonder if I should sell it before it's too late!
Should I Buy This Camera?,
By
Gatorowl
I think this question is one that most of us ask ourselves when considering a purchase of this magnitude. The question is not an easy one, and I'm not sure I made the correct decision in purchasing this marvelous piece of technology. Let me put it in perspective; I am a prosumer camera user. I love photography and take a variety of photographs including family pictures, sports photography (see photos at smugmug for gatorowl), and casual street photography. I have owned lots of cameras including film, digital P&S and DSLRs. The 7D is my sixth DSLR (including a DReb XSI that I sold after two weeks). Before the 7D, my main camera was a 40D, which I found to be satisfactory especially the image quality (IQ). The negatives of the 40D are lack of weather sealing, 6.5 frames per second (fps) repeat rate, 1600 ISO max (can be pushed higher) and some focusing issues especially in sports photography. Of course, when comparing with the the DReb series, these "negatives" immediately become positives. The 40D has better construction, much faster repeat rate, and much better focussing (the T1i has, arguably better high ISO capabilities). The 40D compares well with the Nikon D90. Both cameras are very close. The D90 has video, better high ISO performance, and is a little more compact. However, it is a little slower in repeat rate, and I found selecting D90 focus points a bit on the clumsy side. Anyway, because of lens choices, I decided to go Canon. The 50D held no allure mainly because it was an incremental improvement. So, I thought my kit was set for at least a couple of years.
Notice that in the above discussion, I never talk about IQ. Of all the 10MP or better DSLRs that I have used, there is no noticeable difference in IQ. However, after the 7D announcement and some of the preliminary reviews, I was convinced that the 7D was a quantum improvement over the 40D in every respect. I panicked, sold my 40D and bought a 7D.
So, what did I find? The 7D is a great camera and is a clear improvement over the 40D. In some respects, it is substantially better than a 40D, but IQ isn't one of those major improvements. If you look at your files at 100%-300%, you will see more detail in a 7D shot. I have a standard photo that I take in my office when I get a new lens. I had to blow the photos up to 300% before I could detect differences. There was more texture detail in the 7D and the contrast and saturation were better. However, to be honest, it's not clear how much of this difference is attributable to the camera or the lenses (I shot the 40D with a Sigma 70-300mm and the 7D with a Canon 70-300mm IS lens). Frankly, I'm not surprised. DSLRs are so good right now, differences in IQ at low ISO are marginal. However, I do feel confident that I can shoot at 1600 ISO or 2000 ISO with the 7D without a substantial reduction in quality. While I can control noise at 3200 ISO, color saturation and contrast decline more than I like. With the 40D 800 ISO was as far as I wanted to go, but I would push it to 1000 when desperate. The 7D provides is a major ISO gain.
I really love the 7D focus system. I don't know if it is as good as the Canon 1D series, but it is so, so much better than the 40D. By focusing on the exact point in a field, I feel like my creative options are substantially expanded. I was frequently frustrated by having the wrong part of my picture in focus. This need never happen with the 7D.
The 8fps repeat rate is a nice bonus. It just raises the probability that the exact frame you want will be captured.
So, the question is should you upgrade? You have to decide whether you can afford it; so my advice assume that you can afford the camera, but are looking for the camera that best matches how you shoot.
If this is your first SLR (film or digital):
I'd recommend starting with a Canon T1i or Nikon 90D. The 7D is an extremely complex camera that will take many hours to learn and dozen of hours shooting to master. Unless you have the time to invest in such a camera it will just be a source of frustration. Unlike almost every other camera I've owned, the user will obtain disappointing or bad results unless s/he truly understands this equipment. By contrast, you can take other DSLRs and just start shooting. Unlike the other cameras, the 7D has no scene modes. With other DSLRs you can take your time and gradually learn the more sophisticated capabilities. Most importantly, the quality of your pictures will be just as good.
If you are moving up from an entry level DSLR:
You need to ask yourself why you are moving up? If you are dissatisfied with the IQ, then the 7D is not your answer. Using the 7D, it will take a lot more work (initially) to become proficient. However, if you need a faster framerate, better high ISO performance (although the T1i and D90 are very good for high ISO), long for a better focussing system, or shoot in the rain or the beach, then the 7D might make sense.
If you are moving up from a mid-level XXD or Nikon D300:
As before, you're getting very little IQ improvement (wildlife photographers claim they can use the extra cropping capability, but I'm not convinced it's substantial). Buy the 7D because the features provide you with value. Also, I would seriously discourage anyone from switching from a Nikon D300 to a 7D. There has to be an absolute must-have 7D feature for you to make that leap.
As for me, I don't regret this purchase. I'll never say never, but I'm hoping that the 7D will be my last crop-sensor camera. I love the flexibility and expansion of creative options that the new features allow me. It's a wonderful camera. I'm looking forward to spending many hours becoming intimately acquainted with its capabilities.
Amateur Video Use of the Canon 7D DSLR,
By
R. Lodge
My company bought the Canon EOS 7D for stills for a task requiring wireless remote control and remote imaging of the live view and capture to a laptop hard drive (worked just fine for this task) but after I played with the video and read all I could about using DSLR for video, we bought a second just for video clips of company work. Now I want my own (so that's three). I see why its selling so well. Its extraordinary quality video in low light situations, its quality file format, and its low cost for a camera with the advantage of being able to use various lenses, especially fast lenses for depth of field limiting control makes it a better choice for our work than a prosumer HD "video camera."
Video has never been so much fun. Now there is a whole lot of artistic control possible that I am interested in exploring. I suspect there will be many other amateurs who will find fun with manual video using a DSLR like the 7D. Its total manual control makes it challenging, fun, and capable of video that you can be pleased with (no matter how amateur) because you had control, you had choice and you used all your skills, no matter how slight at the time. Its very addictive and many amateurs will be carried away with artistic enthusiasm, providing you have the patience to practice.
If you are new to DSLR video as I was (still am, certainly), expect many days of practice (well, its been two weeks and there is still a lot of skill to master - especially in follow focus) to get good clips. Plan your shots and use a tripod as much as possible. Also, I think its essential to have a viewer and focusing knob such as the IDC Run & Gun. Google it. I can't imagine how anyone can get good video clips without this simple but well engineered add-on. Again, I think this device is essential to getting good clips. Again, I think this device is essential to getting good clips (get it).
My favorite switching lenses: Canon EF 50mm f/1:1.4 and Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/1:2.8. We, and I personally, do not have much use for the 18-135mm lens that came with the cameras and should have purchased just the body.
I added the BeachTek DXA-5D under the camera so I could use my two XLR shotgun mikes on a bar attached to the top shoe and I also use two Earthworks omni's there too. For less critical sound I attach the Rode stereo video mike.
MORE ADDED FOR DSLR VIDEO AMATEURS:
Because I suspect relative amateurs (like me) will be interested in this camera for its video to break into creativity not possible with fixed lens video cameras, here is some advice to avoid frustration using your fantastic video files from your new Canon 7d:
Some will be frustrated that they can not play the video clips on their PC's after transferring them to their hard drive. Some will be frustrated they can not edit the H.264 codec Quicktime .MOV file format as they come off the camera in even very expensive editing software. Download and purchase CineForm Neo Scene and convert all your clip files to .AVI. This is highly recommended by many professionals.
Want to get your Canon 7d clips easily and quickly to disk and view HD
video using a DVD or a BluRay Player or hand them to others to view? I
highly recommend the inexpensive Sothink HD Movie Maker software from
SourceTec Software Co. Its very inexpensive and its a quick download. Just
add your clips to the editor with the "Add" button and click the "Burn"
button. The software doesn't do much else so there is no learning
curve. You can put many HD clips onto inexpensive DVD disks. And if the
video clips are precious, please burn them to 300 year
archival Gold
disks such as those by Kodak.
EOS 7D Customer Discussions
1 Dec 2011 at 9:57pm
- Posted on Dec 1 2011 at 9:57 pm
by Technology Guy
Another thing to keep in mind is that the 7D needs high qualiity lenses to really take advantage of the higher resolution.
- Posted on Dec 1 2011 at 9:37 pm
by Anna
Thanks! Great info. And yes, it makes sense if you're coming from 5d, the 7d would be less than that in terms of low-light capability. But I do'nt have the money for a 5D-type camera and I'm coming from an XTI, so it seems like it would be a great improvement over my current capabilities.
- Posted on Dec 1 2011 at 9:25 pm
by 7D Guy
The people finding flaws with the 7D's low light performance are probably comparing it to Canon 1-series cameras or the 5D - which all cost considerably more. I upgraded from an XTi to a 7D when they first came out, mostly to shoot night football. For last weekend's game I accidentally left the 7D at home and had to shoot with the XTi. Bummer, but it made me realize how happy I am with the 7D. Just be sure to read the manual - several times. Then check the web for how to use it for the types of shots you like to take. It's more complicated than the XTi, but amazingly more capable. Spectacular auto-focus system, flexible and easy to configure, extensive ability to control your flash through the camera's menu system (no more reading those inscrutable flash LED displays), and much more. Enjoy!
- Posted on Nov 30 2011 at 9:29 pm
by Anna
Technology Guy,You're probably right. I just want to make sure, as much as possible, that I'm making the right choice, given how expensive it is. :)Thanks again for the help,Anna
- Posted on Nov 30 2011 at 3:31 pm
by Technology Guy
Perhaps you are overthinking things a bit. Since the 7D has been thoroughly reviewed at this point in time, buyers know exactly what to expect (expectations may be more of the issue here). Canon has not changed the 7D's hardware at all though there have been a number of firmware releases since those old reviews. If you are still concerned, re-ask your question at http://photography-on-the.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=9
- Posted on Nov 30 2011 at 6:48 am
by Anna
Thanks Technology Guy. One of the reasons I'm not an early adopter is because I like to see many of the bugs from the first release addressed before I get that gadget. And I just wanted to see if that issue was addressed, as I have not seen negative feedback about ISO/low light issues in about a year. It seems that it was addressed, but is there a way to find out (like is there a "release number" for cameras?).Thanks for such a prompt reply,Anna
- Posted on Nov 30 2011 at 2:12 am
by Technology Guy
I own an XTi, 30D and a 7D among other cameras. Believe me, you'll be VERY pleased with the 7D's high ISO performance. ISO 3200 looks better on the 7D to me than ISO 800 did on the XTi. I regularly shoot very low light events such as electronic art shows with excellent results. As for those old negative reviews you mention, having used the 7D extensively myself from its initial release I'm afraid I have no logical explanation to offer for them.
- Posted on Nov 29 2011 at 11:34 pm
by Anna
Such great information. Thanks you all. When I first saw the headline, I thought I had written it (LOL), since I'm in the exact situation at the moment (upgrading from an XTi and considering 60D and 7D).One of the things I am looking for is good capabilities for low-light shooting and some of the reviews have me concerned. But it also looks like a lot of those negative reviews are about a year old. Does anyone have information to indicate that the noise issue (at low ISO and/or low light) has been addressed? Or were those just "lemon" units?Any info would be greatly appreciated,Anna
- Posted on Sep 4 2011 at 9:11 pm
by vikta
I use a 7D for a year now and love it, first off the solid feel. go look at both of them with little pressure at best buy. they stock both. I now the 7D has a magnesium body and waterproofing seals. You will be limited with the 60D it's designed for the Enthusiast, while the 7D is designed for the Semi-Pro just like your lenses. Yes the glass takes the picture but you will need a body to match for years to come not one that will start to show weaknesses out of the box. The articulating screen can be easy to break. I promise you I droped my 7D with a 24-105 f4L from 4.5 feet off my tri-pod and only the filter broke on the 24-105. The 7D is more solid then it feels almost tank like. and the speed can be reamarkable when needed plus the autofocusing system will help you get the shoot with out missing them much easier. if you can afford it don't waste money or time on a 60D go Semi-Pro with the 7D. The only weakness with the 7D is that the CF card might overheat while shooting video over 20 minuets and it doesn't match a full frame sensor capabilities.
- Posted on Feb 2 2011 at 12:38 am
by Technology Guy
Karen-The 70-300mm IS spec lists a maximum magnification of .26X at 300mm except you'll have to back up about 5 feet for the lens to focus. Your 28-135mm has a maximum magnification of .19X at a distance of about 20 inches. You could could always use a set of extension tubes with your 28-135mm for considerably more magnification. For a telephoto lens, I'd recommend taking a look at the 70-200mm f/4L or even f/2.8L. The f/4L non-IS version costs about the same as the 70-300 IS and will show you just what the 7D is capable of. If you can afford it, condsider the IS version.For flash, I'd highly recommnd the Canon Speedlite 430EX II Flash for Canon Digital SLR Cameras . It works very well with the 7D, is fairly powerful, has lots of features and can be bounced from a white ceiling for a much softer and MUCH more flattering light. The 7D can also control this flash wirelessly if you want to move the flash off the camera or try some more advanced flash photography.
1 Nov 2009 at 6:32pm
- Posted on Nov 1 2009 at 6:32 pm
by Shailesh Bhosale
Thanks for this information Tom. I am not familiar with the live view mode. So when I get my 7D, I will try the live view mode shooting, and if results are good then I will look further for buying a 1.4X or 2X TC.
- Posted on Oct 31 2009 at 5:04 pm
by Tom Martin
You can get any Canon camera to attempt to focus, by taping over certain pins on the TC to block the lens from telling the camera it is not an f/5.6 or less lens. However in practicality you can expect a lot of hunting.The Flickr discussion talks about either taping the contacts, using a TC that doesn't transmit the information to start with, or using Live-View for the focus, which would work with any Live-View camera including the 7D.
- Posted on Oct 29 2009 at 10:16 pm
by Shailesh Bhosale
I read some posting on Flickr that Canon 7D is able to autofocus a Canon 100-400 mm lens with both 1.4X and 2.0X Teleconverters. Canon says - " with a TC, autofocus will work with lens having an f/4 or faster maximum aperture, except Canon 1Ds".Can someone please try it on 7D and let me know?
16 Jan 2010 at 12:54pm
- Posted on Jan 16 2010 at 12:54 pm
by O. Ali
Buy a 7d if you can afford it even if you don't have a good glass. I own 1d mark IIN, 5d mark II, 7d, 50d (sold), and 40d. I use the 7d mostly in sports and natural photography (paid work). Believe it or not, I use the 7d with a 300mm F2.8 as my main body and the 1d mark IIN with 70-200mm F2.8 as the secondery body during professional soccer matches. the 7d is this good. I read many complaints about the camera but believe me, most of those people are bunch of fools with lots of budget in their pocket and no skill what so ever. Most of them are people with little skills trying to shoot their Son's/daughter's sport matches. they go to a sport event, put everything to auto or semi auto and believe that the camera will do the job for them. Even with the best equipment (1d range and L glasses) you will find professional sport photographers use manual settings, lots of custom settings, and a great deal of skill to get the result they do. Having a great body and no skill does not cut it. I know lots of Nikon users and the things are not different at that side as well. People Buy a D300/s and then they trash it saying that the 51 points 3d focus system is rubbish and good for nothing. But don't blame the tool, blame the user.
- Posted on Dec 2 2009 at 12:49 pm
by P. MSakamoto
Hi, have what I think is the value combo for the "power amateur" photographer. 40d + battery grip + 17-55mm EFS f2.8 + 70-200mm f2.8L USM IS. i shoot my kids events (Sports, music, plays, etc.) and church, school, company events. I make about 20,000 or more exposures a year. After going through a lot of combos of glass, bodies, etc. I think that this is still the way to go since it doesn't over-invest in the depreciating part of the Canon system (the bodies) and centers on the piece that makes the biggest difference: glass. I also spent some money on a couple of Canon Speedlites (430ex and 580exII) as well as diffusers and remote triggering. All cameras work better if you control the light. If you spend your money in the order of 1. Glass, 2. lighting, 3. body - I think you'll produce better pictures and spend less money in the long run. I think everyone hammered the glass issue, so hopefully someone will read this and realize that $1000 of lighting is a lot of lighting and will really make almost any lens look good if you are able to deploy it.
- Posted on Nov 25 2009 at 8:01 am
by Alan Myers
I'm a professional photographer, have and use both 50D (three) and 7D (two), as well as a 5D MkII....Frankly, the 7D is a more specialized camera in a lot of respects and might be a case of overkill for many people. When I look at reviews of cameras and see complaints, I often suspect that it's a "user error", not any real problem with the camera itself. I expect to see a lot more "issues" with 7D, because of the added complexity of the auto focus system, in particular. After a couple months and a few thousand images, I've only just started expanding beyond basic setup of the AF.Not that 7D isn't good... It is. Lot's to like about it. It's just that the 50D is also a darned capable camera and might be a more straight forward upgrade for a lot of people. Most especially, if the $500 or so saved buying 50D instead would give you more budget to purchase top quality lenses, that will do more for your images than anything else. The 7D is sort of a "1D MkIV Lite". It's the most pro-oriented APS-C camera Canon has produced yet (a gap they needed to fill). 7D is mainly designed as a sports/action camera. Of course it can be used for a variety of purposes, but this is where it will excel. 7D is significantly heavier than the 50D (and actually slightly heavier than 5D MkII). Handle both cameras in a store, before you commit to buying. Oh, and the usual product cycle for Canon cameras: 12-18 months for the Rebel/xxxD. Almost exactly 18 months for the xxD series. 2 to 3 years for the 5D and 1-Series. They deviate from this a bit, depending upon competition and the need to add new features. Video is a good example of a new feature they have had to implement more quickly and upset the usual replacement cycle a bit.
- Posted on Nov 2 2009 at 5:11 pm
by Carolyn A. Fahm
Thank you for sharing your insights. It is very helpful to help me focus on what is important. It is a sad fact that digital cameras have more in common with electronic devises than they do with the original SLR's that were purely optical and mechanical. So, as you both point out, they are not really investments in the sense that a Hassalblad once was. I do think it is worth waiting to see the 60D. I have been going through photography withdrawal pangs but have discovered that is just barely possible to live without a camera - although it is a lot less fun.
- Posted on Nov 2 2009 at 2:49 pm
by P. Warren
I would recommend buying quality glass before the upgraded body. Outside of video, the 40D will do most of what you need. I have seen them used for $600 to $700 lately. Split your 18-200 range and decide which you use most and buy a lens for that. 70-200F4 IS would be great on the long end. 17-55 2.8 IS would be great on the wide end. You would be much better with that combination.
- Posted on Nov 2 2009 at 10:42 am
by Paul LoveKing
A camera body won't take you too far into the future. There will be a new camera in 6 months to get excited about, and any given model will be replaced in 18 months (at most). If your XTi is broken, then by all means, replace it. If not, buy the L lens that best covers your shooting style, and hold off on replacing the camera body. The 7 will work with your lenses, but it will highlight every weakness of the lens. A good lens, on the other hand, will make your XTi look better. I am still shooting with my XT, using the 24-70mm L, and the 100mm macro. With those two lenses in my bag, I feel ready to upgrade the camera body, but with money being tight, I'm thinking the 40D might be my upgrade, as it will give me the best low light for low dollar. The 7D will be a better camera. It's newer, and it's higher up the canon product line. Will it be better enough to justify the additional cost? We don't know yet, and it depends on your needs as well as the technical quality of the camera. Just remember, shortly after the 7D actually becomes available, the 1D mkIV will hit stores and blow out the high end, and then we will see a 60D which may not be better but will be newer.
- Posted on Oct 25 2009 at 10:38 am
by L. Freel
Carolyn A. Fahm: The only "major problem" you mention has to do with photo enlargements. If you stay with prints of 11x16 or smaller you may not see any issues. It's just a waste of megapixels to have the 7D's 18. Dpreview.com will have a complete review on this camera shortly if not already. My 2 cents.Update Nov. 14, 2009: The issue of dynamic range still haunts the 50D as well as the 7D. The 40D still out performs both in this regard having +0.7 stops more shadow range and +0.1 stops more highlight range for a total of +0.8 stops of additional usable range at an ISO of 100. This is based on Dpreviews reviews of these cameras which I find it interesting and puzzling. This sort of detective work really should not to be necessary but maybe I'm just nitpicking. Best of luck on your choice.
- Posted on Oct 25 2009 at 10:04 am
by Carolyn A. Fahm
Thanks for this. I have the Canon 18-200 lens which I used on my now defunct Rebel xTi . I also have the kit lenses that came with the camera. I cannot afford both another body and new lenses. I had thought that the 7D would be an investment that take me into the future but if it does not work well with the lenses I already have then this is a major problem.
- Posted on Oct 19 2009 at 11:46 pm
by htche
Zobia, don't by the 7D unless you also plan to get a L lens with it. Any of the following woudd do: 24-70 L, 24-105 L, or EFS 17-55 (which is not a L but same price and IQ). If you are on a budget, i suggest you go buy one of these lenses and stick it on a 40D or 50D. You will be very happy either way.
- Posted on Oct 19 2009 at 2:01 pm
by Joe C.
Camera body is not an investment; it is just a cost to keep up with the boys. Quality glass is definitely an investment. I have two L glasses and they have gone up in price now. My camera body is less than half the price I paid for. Having said that I will also follow the lemmings and get a 7D for Christmas. ;-)
24 Sep 2009 at 4:37pm
- Posted on Sep 24 2009 at 4:37 pm
by S. Robertson
I Think I am going to update my 30D with the 7D and keep the 30D as a backup. From what I have been able to figure out by reading PREviews and REviews the 7d has a whole new sensor and prosseser so the noise should not be as bad as the 40/50D.
- Posted on Sep 24 2009 at 9:37 am
by win
Hey, what's wrong with my 20D? OK, I finally decided to upgrade and put my pre order in.
- Posted on Sep 20 2009 at 6:01 pm
by G. Jackson
I'm excited for this new camera and have been crunching numbers to see how I can afford it, especially since I need an upgrade from my ANCIENT 20D. This is just what Canon needs to compete with all of those in-between pro, semi-pro, serious amateur, etc. that Nikon has compared to Canon's current options of an XTi, 50D and the Mark III. (I'm aware of the 5D series, but for me I'm not going to be bringing that slow of a camera onto the sidelines). Glad they got the message and I look forward to the upgrade.
- Posted on Sep 16 2009 at 9:13 pm
by Paulybrooklyn
I just hope all those pixels don't mean noisy shadows! It would be the perfect camera otherwise...they should really just keep these cameras at 12 mp unless they have some spectacular new technology.
- Posted on Sep 9 2009 at 12:27 am
by Charles L. Roberts
I truly believe this will be a ground-breaking, trend setting design. Keep in mind the D300(s) is over two years old. Nikon has shat themselves by now, undoubtedly. I bought s nearly brand new D700 for $1,350 locally on Craigs List. When I thought about selling my Canon 40d and the few great lenses I had to invest in Nikon's system, I had a come to Jesus meeting. 12mp FF, or Canon's bright future with the following products: 5d Mark II; 50mm/1.2; 85mm/1.2; 35mm/1.4; 17-40/f4; 24-105 F4; 28-135/3.5-5.6. etc.....Glad I stayed where I am at. And now the EOS 7D!!!!!!!!!19-pt Af; 8 FPS; 1080p 30 24p. Wow!!To end this mesage: I resold D700 for $900 profit two days later. Never bought one single lens. aNEver ever ever looked back. Nikon is struggling to keep up...and the hype is ridiculous They are not that great. Sorry folks. A fact is a fact
- Posted on Sep 8 2009 at 10:36 am
by Charles A. Nakell
I am hoping for a wonderful wildlife camera. I admit my hopes have been lifted by the five, solid, early reviews, but nothing can truly convince me (based on past experience) short of my own field work with the 7D testing the auto focus in action with my 300mm 2.8, and seeing the iso 400 images come out of my printer after raw/photoshop processing. Fingers crossed.
- Posted on Sep 8 2009 at 12:19 am
by Xmedic
I have waited past the 40, 50, and new 5d for something new.
- Posted on Sep 6 2009 at 8:10 pm
by Chris Stankis
So far the reviews have been stellar-Canon supposedly designed this one from the ground up, following the inputs of pro and semi-pro photographers.I have shelved my plans to buy a 50d and will wait for the 7d to make it onto the market.
- Posted on Sep 4 2009 at 4:03 am
by SVSART
Well looks like I have to buy this, sigh.... It's bad when you are hoping for a bad review, so that you don't have to buy something
2 Nov 2009 at 5:05pm
- Posted on Nov 2 2009 at 5:05 pm
by B. Mah
Maybe it has something to do with the ghosting issue Canon admitted to last week? They might've slowed production since the problem seems with to stem from the sensor itself. Just my theory.
- Posted on Nov 2 2009 at 3:04 pm
by LacubriousOne
When I placed my order on the Oct. 28th the delivery estimate was November 3rd (one day shipping). At the time I clicked to purchase, the item screen said that it was "In Stock as of xxxxxxx". As of today November 2nd it has not shipped and the item screen now says 1-4 weeks!!! AAARRRRGGGG!!!! I guess canon has not caught up with demand yet.
- Posted on Oct 28 2009 at 9:25 am
by M. Tanji
Finally! Amazon is preparing my order for shippment.
- Posted on Oct 27 2009 at 1:44 pm
by Juan Dela Cruz
Patience is a virtue......Excerpt from Amazon e-mail:Hello from http://Amazon.com.We are writing about the order you placed on October 14 2009 (Order# 102-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxx). The item(s) listed below will actually ship sooner than we originally expected: "Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD (Body Only)" Previous estimated arrival date: November 02 2009 - November 10 2009 New estimated arrival date: October 28 2009Actually recieved the item today, Oct 27, 2009! Cheers!
- Posted on Oct 26 2009 at 4:49 am
by Imo Gene
I pre-ordered the 7d body only from amazon on Oct 20 and received a notice today that it is being shipped and to be delivered Oct 29.
- Posted on Oct 24 2009 at 10:40 am
by TC
sept 15 order 0ct21 arrival body only AMAZING...like a sportscar compared to Rebel XT, 5D and 30D. ergonomics...incredible! quick view professional level control. ISO 6400 get otta here..... Worth the wait...for years! oH, i rather have a 30 day Amazon backup myself although i've not needed to utilize it yet! Gotta go and shoot this baby...did i mention the shutter on this beauty? do a trial drive but not with my BABY... like a red Ferrari... a once in a lifetime experience!!! TyGr <><
- Posted on Oct 23 2009 at 12:32 am
by SeventhWard
I ordered my 7d Kit from Amazon on 9/15 -- got it today 10/22. Yay.
- Posted on Oct 22 2009 at 12:49 pm
by kittroid
I pre-ordered from Amazon on 10/02, received e-mail yesterday (10/21) that my order would ship with expidited shipping and received it about an hour ago (10/22). Body only.
- Posted on Oct 22 2009 at 8:48 am
by B. Mah
Sorry Lindsay, mine's the body only. It looks like Amazon is getting those models in while retail stores like Best Buy have priority on the kits. Just my own observations, so don't hold me to it. Good luck finding a kit!
5 Oct 2009 at 2:30pm
- Posted on Oct 5 2009 at 2:30 pm
by Dennis Hinkamp
I'm sure liking what I'm seeing people are doing with the 7D already. There are lots of good examples on the Vimeo 7D channel http://vimeo.com/channels/eos7d#6885171
- Posted on Sep 30 2009 at 7:26 pm
by Peter Breadmore
Not strictly true actually. Most Canon L lenses are parfocal and many non L lenses are also parfocal. Typically to see this effect to the best, you should focus at the longest focal length then zoom wider (since there is more DOF at wider angles) so it works well for certain types of shot.
- Posted on Sep 27 2009 at 8:52 pm
by Dennis Hinkamp
So if I'm reading this correctly; it is auto focus just like a still camera, but not continous auto focus in movie mode? I also don't see anything in the description about what kind of audio inputs it accepts. I'm assuming not XLR, but maybe you could get an adaptor.
- Posted on Sep 24 2009 at 11:05 pm
by Y. Yerushalmi
That's correct but you may want to re-consider. The 7D (like the 5D) can autofocus during live-recording. But the focus 'searches', which will look slow and poor, and will generate mechanical noise. The movie mode is really intended to be used in situations where you plan the shot in advance (and can control the focus as the subject moves manually) or better yet, never need to change focus. Additionally, it is not necessarily obvious, but any use of a canon zoom lens to zoom will automatically shift the target out-of-focus (EF lenses unlike movie camera lenses that cost a LOT, do not maintain focus as you zoom). If your main desire is for the ability to video in high-def targets that move around a lot (like a soccer game), you may want to look at any of the many high-def camcorders. The sensor sizes on those is smaller (which means flatter depth of field) and they focus MUCH better as you move the camera. If you absolutely want to use a 'real lens' on a larger sensor, your best option is to use a LOT of light, and set the the lens to the highest F-stop possible, which will keep everything in the image in focus no matter where it moves to...
- Posted on Sep 21 2009 at 11:40 am
by C. Davis
Yes it does.Though auto-focus is not recommended because the sound of the lens focusing could be picked up in the audio recording. (especially with non-USM lenses)From here: http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&articleID=3050&productID=329&articleTypeID=5 "AF activated by shutter button: If you want AF, the factory default for the EOS 7D is to just press the shutter button half-way down - the same as you would when shooting stills. AF can be moved strictly to a rear button if you prefer, via the 7D's extensive new control customization."
- Posted on Sep 21 2009 at 1:16 am
by William Young
Literature reads like it's only manual like the Nikon 90D which I have. I'm frustrated with it cuz I'm not good at manually focusing while subjects are moving.... I'm looking to eventually upgrade to one that can auto focus in HD video. Does the 5D Mach II have auto focus in HD movie mode? I read the Canon website for info on both products but couldn't determine. As far as I know at this point, 5D Mach II does and 7D doesn't. Pls confirm if you know thx!
EOS 7D Detailed Reviews
Preview of the Canon EOS 7D at Digital Photography Review.
Full Review of the Canon EOS 7D at Digital Photography Review.
Preview of the Canon EOS 7D at photo.net.
Comparison of the Canon EOS 7D to a Rebel XSi.
Home |
EOS 7D |
Features |
Info |
Reviews |
Specifications
Best Price |
HD Video |
EOS 7-D |
Accessories |
Resources |
Contact
Site Map |
Privacy |
Copyright |
Disclosure |
Terms